MoonVM 1 GB RAM 100 Mbit/s Bandbreite Taiwan KVM VPS-Test

Details : MoonVM: 30 $/Monat/1 GB Speicher/10 GB SSD-Speicherplatz/3 TB Datenverkehr/KVM/Taiwan. Gute Leistung, gutes Netzwerk, starke Bandbreite und IP-Umschaltung mit einem Klick im Hintergrund. Der Kauf lohnt sich!
Willkommen zur TeleGram-Gruppendiskussion: https://t.me/zhujiwiki

1. Systeminformationen, Bandbreite, I/O-Test

 CPU Model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2673 v3 @ 2.40GHz CPU Cores : 1 Cores @ 2399.998 MHz x86_64 CPU Cache : 4096 KB OS : Debian GNU/Linux 8 (64 Bit) KVM Kernel : 4.12.9-041209-generic Total Space : 18.0 GB (1.3 GB Used) Total RAM : 988 MB (313 MB Used 13 MB Buff) Total SWAP : 1023 MB (0 MB Used) Uptime : 0 days 3 hour 17 min Load average : 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 ASN & ISP : AS3462, HiNet Organization : HiNet Location : Taichung, Taiwan / TW Region : Taichung City ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 555 MB/s I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 608 MB/s I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 634 MB/s Average I/O Speed : 599.0 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Speedtest.net 98.72 Mbit/s 95.10 Mbit/s 5.893 ms Shanghai CT 98.08 Mbit/s 86.08 Mbit/s 61.79 ms Kunming CT 77.54 Mbit/s 93.96 Mbit/s 23.464 ms Shanghai CU 81.13 Mbit/s 63.04 Mbit/s 60.277 ms Xi'an CU 89.56 Mbit/s 49.37 Mbit/s 85.858 ms Chongqing CU 96.52 Mbit/s 81.74 Mbit/s 54.091 ms Xi'an CM 75.21 Mbit/s 57.96 Mbit/s 69.637 ms Chengdu CM 101.81 Mbit/s 42.66 Mbit/s 71.665 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Finished in : 4 min 28 sec Timestamp : 2018-07-09 14:42:13 GMT+8

2. Upload-/Download-Bandbreitentest

 Retrieving speedtest.net server list... Selecting best server based on ping... Hosted by Chief Telecom (Taichung) [1.78 km]: 4.481 ms Testing download speed.......................... Download: 69.99 Mbit/s Testing upload speed............................ Upload: 73.97 Mbit/s

3. Inländische Zugangsgeschwindigkeit

4. Festplatten-E/A-Leistungstest

 dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 2.54861 s, 105 MB/s

5. UnixBench

 Benchmark Run: Mon Jul 09 2018 13:33:59 - 14:02:04 1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 30772501.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 3948.3 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 5904.8 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1247446.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 354355.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 3233406.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 2306697.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 381486.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 16471.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 10161.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1331.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 3864413.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 30772501.2 2636.9 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3948.3 717.9 Execl Throughput 43.0 5904.8 1373.2 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1247446.4 3150.1 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 354355.4 2141.1 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 3233406.9 5574.8 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2306697.6 1854.3 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 381486.0 953.7 Process Creation 126.0 16471.9 1307.3 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 10161.6 2396.6 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1331.5 2219.2 System Call Overhead 15000.0 3864413.3 2576.3 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1953.9

6. Paketverlusttest

 Ping from 192.168.0.29 to 36.234.xxx.xxx ============================================================================== 07/09 14:38:22.414 Ping to 36.234.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL: 07/09 14:38:22.492 PingMin #1 Reply 32 bytes from 36.234.xxx.xxx: time=72ms TTL=49, ave=72.00ms 07/09 14:38:23.481 PingMin #2 Reply 32 bytes from 36.234.xxx.xxx: time=67ms TTL=49, ave=69.50ms 07/09 14:38:25.237 超時#3 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 07/09 14:38:29.238 超時#7 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 07/09 14:38:32.498 PingMax #11 Reply 32 bytes from 36.234.xxx.xxx: time=83ms TTL=49, ave=69.67ms 07/09 14:38:36.502 PingMax #15 Reply 32 bytes from 36.234.xxx.xxx: time=89ms TTL=49, ave=70.69ms 07/09 14:38:40.529 PingMax #19 Reply 32 bytes from 36.234.xxx.xxx: time=112ms TTL=49, ave=72.53ms 07/09 14:38:48.536 PingMax #27 Reply 32 bytes from 36.234.xxx.xxx: time=121ms TTL=49, ave=74.36ms 07/09 14:39:27.568 PingMax #66 Reply 32 bytes from 36.234.xxx.xxx: time=149ms TTL=49, ave=73.72ms 07/09 14:39:48.237 超時#86 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 07/09 14:39:51.237 超時#89 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 07/09 14:40:01.530 === 100 有效發送, 96 接收, 4.00% 丟失, 74.55ms 平均值=== --- 結果& 統計信息------------------------------------------------------開始時間: 2018/07/09 14:38:22經過時間: 000:01:39結束時間: 2018/07/09 14:40:01 ---------------- 100 總計發送0 無效接收(除了超時的其它錯誤) ---------------- 100 有效發送96 有效接收4 timed out (4.00% 丟失) Ping 最小值67ms, 最大值149ms, 平均值74.55ms

7. Routenverfolgung <br /> Telekommunikation

China Unicom

bewegen

8. YouTube-Geschwindigkeitstest