|
Details: Jiguang KVM: 11 Yuan/Monat/384 MB Speicher/5 GB SSD-Speicherplatz/500 GB Datenverkehr/KVM/Los Angeles PZ 1. Systeminformationen, Bandbreite, I/O-Test CPU Model : QEMU Virtual CPU version 2.5+ CPU Cores : 1 Cores @ 2999.998 MHz x86_64 CPU Cache : 16384 KB OS : Debian GNU/Linux 8 (64 Bit) KVM Kernel : 3.16.0-6-amd64 Total Space : 8.9 GB (1.1 GB Used) Total RAM : 746 MB (297 MB Used 15 MB Buff) Total SWAP : 1023 MB (0 MB Used) Uptime : 0 days 0 hour 3 min Load average : 0.57, 0.16, 0.05 ASN & ISP : AS40676, Wawahost Technology Organization : Psychz Networks Location : Durian Tunggal, Malaysia / MY Region : Melaka ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 148 MB/s I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 227 MB/s I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 359 MB/s Average I/O Speed : 244.7 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Speedtest.net 33.00 Mbit/s 121.29 Mbit/s 299.073 ms Shanghai CT 34.53 Mbit/s 25.32 Mbit/s 162.313 ms Kunming CT 22.00 Mbit/s 33.83 Mbit/s 166.846 ms Chengdu CT 10.13 Mbit/s 289.30 Mbit/s 202.931 ms Shanghai CU 11.99 Mbit/s 239.45 Mbit/s 180.187 ms Xi'an CU 66.26 Mbit/s 178.99 Mbit/s 290.458 ms Chongqing CU 5.39 Mbit/s 11.02 Mbit/s 350.928 ms Xi'an CM 26.47 Mbit/s 197.82 Mbit/s 248.97 ms Chengdu CM 3.34 Mbit/s 4.39 Mbit/s 000.000 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Finished in : 4 min 16 sec Timestamp : 2018-06-26 22:30:30 GMT+8
2. Upload-/Download-Bandbreitentest Retrieving speedtest.net server list... Selecting best server based on ping... Hosted by Celcom Axiata (Kuching) [261.29 km]: 208.934 ms Testing download speed........................... Download: 118.84 Mbit/s Testing upload speed............................. Upload: 17.38 Mbit/s 3. Inländische Zugangsgeschwindigkeit
4. Festplatten-E/A-Leistungstest dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 8.07406 s, 33.2 MB/s 5. UnixBench Benchmark Run: Tue Jun 26 2018 21:53:17 - 22:21:22 1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 34367636.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 4575.1 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 2733.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 194591.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 51426.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 632155.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 304426.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 76567.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 6129.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3597.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 504.0 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 274381.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 34367636.8 2945.0 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4575.1 831.8 Execl Throughput 43.0 2733.1 635.6 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 194591.7 491.4 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 51426.7 310.7 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 632155.5 1089.9 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 304426.3 244.7 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 76567.1 191.4 Process Creation 126.0 6129.8 486.5 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3597.3 848.4 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 504.0 840.0 System Call Overhead 15000.0 274381.5 182.9 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 550.2 6. Paketverlusttest Ping from 10.0.0.20 to 103.116.xxx.xxx ============================================================================== 06/26 22:37:55.472 Ping to 103.116.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL: 06/26 22:37:55.769 PingMin #1 Reply 32 bytes from 103.116.xxx.xxx: time=305ms TTL=52, ave=305.00ms 06/26 22:37:56.769 PingMin #2 Reply 32 bytes from 103.116.xxx.xxx: time=298ms TTL=52, ave=301.50ms 06/26 22:37:57.761 PingMin #3 Reply 32 bytes from 103.116.xxx.xxx: time=296ms TTL=52, ave=299.67ms 06/26 22:38:00.746 PingMin #6 Reply 32 bytes from 103.116.xxx.xxx: time=293ms TTL=52, ave=297.67ms 06/26 22:38:02.747 PingMin #8 Reply 32 bytes from 103.116.xxx.xxx: time=291ms TTL=52, ave=296.25ms 06/26 22:38:11.746 PingMin #17 Reply 32 bytes from 103.116.xxx.xxx: time=287ms TTL=52, ave=296.24ms 06/26 22:38:15.745 PingMin #21 Reply 32 bytes from 103.116.xxx.xxx: time=286ms TTL=52, ave=294.81ms 06/26 22:38:22.261 超時#27 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/26 22:38:22.777 PingMax #28 Reply 32 bytes from 103.116.xxx.xxx: time=317ms TTL=52, ave=296.00ms 06/26 22:38:23.746 PingMin #29 Reply 32 bytes from 103.116.xxx.xxx: time=283ms TTL=52, ave=295.54ms 06/26 22:38:24.777 PingMax #30 Reply 32 bytes from 103.116.xxx.xxx: time=325ms TTL=52, ave=296.55ms 06/26 22:38:34.744 PingMin #40 Reply 32 bytes from 103.116.xxx.xxx: time=280ms TTL=52, ave=296.82ms 06/26 22:38:37.255 超時#42 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/26 22:38:54.737 PingMin #60 Reply 32 bytes from 103.116.xxx.xxx: time=279ms TTL=52, ave=295.41ms 06/26 22:38:59.739 PingMin #65 Reply 32 bytes from 103.116.xxx.xxx: time=278ms TTL=52, ave=294.86ms 06/26 22:39:34.758 === 100 有效發送, 98 接收, 2.00% 丟失, 294.47ms 平均值=== --- 結果& 統計信息------------------------------------------------------開始時間: 2018/06/26 22:37:55經過時間: 000:01:39結束時間: 2018/06/26 22:39:34 ---------------- 100 總計發送0 無效接收(除了超時的其它錯誤) ---------------- 100 有效發送98 有效接收2 timed out (2.00% 丟失) Ping 最小值278ms, 最大值325ms, 平均值294.47ms 7. Routenverfolgung <br /> Telekommunikation
China Unicom
8. YouTube-Geschwindigkeitstest
|
