|
Dies ist eine Testmaschine, Details: https://www.lowendtalk.com/discussion/147326/impact-vps-nvme-kvm-beta-rewards-for-participating#latest
Die Konfiguration besteht aus 2 Kernen, 4 GB Arbeitsspeicher, 60 GB NVMe-SSD-Speicherplatz und 4 TB Datenverkehr. Sie dient derzeit zum Testen. Wenn Sie jetzt eine Testmaschine beantragen, können Sie sie später zu einem ermäßigten Preis verlängern. Mit dieser Konfiguration kostet sie weniger als 10 $, was ein großartiger Wert ist.
Willkommen zur TeleGram-Gruppendiskussion: https://t.me/zhujiwiki 1. Systeminformationen, Bandbreite, I/O-Test CPU Model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) Silver 4114 CPU @ 2.20GHz CPU Cores : 2 Cores @ 2199.992 MHz x86_64 CPU Cache : 4096 KB OS : Debian GNU/Linux 8 (64 Bit) KVM Kernel : 3.16.0-4-amd64 Total Space : 60.0 GB (1.0 GB Used) Total RAM : 3965 MB (332 MB Used 30 MB Buff) Total SWAP : 0 MB (0 MB Used) Uptime : 1 days 2 hour 37 min Load average : 0.21, 0.05, 0.02 ASN & ISP : AS63356, Subnet Labs LLC Organization : Subnet Labs LLC Location : San Diego (Nestor), United States / US Region : California ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 862 MB/s I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 980 MB/s I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 995 MB/s Average I/O Speed : 945.7 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Speedtest.net 179.00 Mbit/s 1781.88 Mbit/s 2.632 ms Shanghai CT 17.54 Mbit/s 33.40 Mbit/s 243.195 ms Kunming CT 4.67 Mbit/s 25.93 Mbit/s 000.000 ms Chengdu CT 22.92 Mbit/s 305.30 Mbit/s 213.296 ms Shanghai CU 35.40 Mbit/s 117.08 Mbit/s 205.795 ms Xi'an CU 12.97 Mbit/s 49.55 Mbit/s 365.048 ms Chongqing CU 19.13 Mbit/s 22.39 Mbit/s 266.267 ms Xi'an CM 1.68 Mbit/s 188.53 Mbit/s 267.671 ms Chengdu CM 1.87 Mbit/s 11.55 Mbit/s 235.786 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Finished in : 3 min 36 sec Timestamp : 2018-06-26 09:45:32 GMT+8
2. Upload-/Download-Bandbreitentest Retrieving speedtest.net server list... Selecting best server based on ping... Hosted by Wowrack (Seattle, WA) [1.51 km]: 3.319 ms Testing download speed............................ Download: 3476.95 Mbit/s Testing upload speed.............................. Upload: 1801.98 Mbit/s 3. Inländische Zugangsgeschwindigkeit
4. Festplatten-E/A-Leistungstest dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 3.97983 s, 67.4 MB/s 5. UnixBench Benchmark Run: Mon Jun 25 2018 21:48:07 - 22:16:24 2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 18778736.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 2985.3 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 3386.4 lps (29.8 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 682841.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 194076.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1456483.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 1183447.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 257365.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 8547.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 7655.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1669.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 2577467.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 18778736.2 1609.1 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2985.3 542.8 Execl Throughput 43.0 3386.4 787.5 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 682841.0 1724.3 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 194076.0 1172.7 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1456483.9 2511.2 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1183447.4 951.3 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 257365.2 643.4 Process Creation 126.0 8547.5 678.4 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 7655.5 1805.5 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1669.7 2782.9 System Call Overhead 15000.0 2577467.7 1718.3 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1234.4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Mon Jun 25 2018 22:16:24 - 22:44:38 2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 30822909.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 5917.7 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 7961.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 774756.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 191847.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2156569.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 2368796.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 480628.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 18128.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 11253.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1640.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 3283481.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 30822909.3 2641.2 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 5917.7 1076.0 Execl Throughput 43.0 7961.0 1851.4 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 774756.5 1956.5 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 191847.9 1159.2 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2156569.7 3718.2 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2368796.9 1904.2 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 480628.3 1201.6 Process Creation 126.0 18128.9 1438.8 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 11253.3 2654.1 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1640.8 2734.6 System Call Overhead 15000.0 3283481.3 2189.0 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1907.5 6. Paketverlusttest Ping from 10.0.0.20 to 64.110.xxx.xxx ============================================================================== 06/26 09:48:12.453 Ping to 64.110.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL: 06/26 09:48:12.672 PingMin #1 Reply 32 bytes from 64.110.xxx.xxx: time=211ms TTL=51, ave=211.00ms 06/26 09:48:13.648 PingMax #2 Reply 32 bytes from 64.110.xxx.xxx: time=213ms TTL=51, ave=212.00ms 06/26 09:48:17.650 PingMax #6 Reply 32 bytes from 64.110.xxx.xxx: time=214ms TTL=51, ave=212.17ms 06/26 09:48:18.649 PingMin #7 Reply 32 bytes from 64.110.xxx.xxx: time=210ms TTL=51, ave=211.86ms 06/26 09:48:21.663 PingMax #10 Reply 32 bytes from 64.110.xxx.xxx: time=218ms TTL=51, ave=212.80ms 06/26 09:48:37.665 PingMax #26 Reply 32 bytes from 64.110.xxx.xxx: time=219ms TTL=51, ave=212.23ms 06/26 09:48:38.683 PingMax #27 Reply 32 bytes from 64.110.xxx.xxx: time=236ms TTL=51, ave=213.11ms 06/26 09:48:41.655 PingMin #30 Reply 32 bytes from 64.110.xxx.xxx: time=209ms TTL=51, ave=212.83ms 06/26 09:49:51.658 === 100 有效發送, 100 接收, 0.00% 丟失, 212.45ms 平均值=== --- 結果& 統計信息------------------------------------------------------開始時間: 2018/06/26 09:48:12經過時間: 000:01:39結束時間: 2018/06/26 09:49:51 ---------------- 100 總計發送0 無效接收(除了超時的其它錯誤) ---------------- 100 有效發送100 有效接收0 timed out (0.00% 丟失) Ping 最小值209ms, 最大值236ms, 平均值212.45ms 7. Routenverfolgung <br />Telekommunikation
China Unicom
bewegen
8. YouTube-Geschwindigkeitstest |
