IonSwitch 512 MB RAM SSD-Festplatte Seattle KVM VPS Testbericht [Sehr gut]

Details : IonSwitch: 3,50 $/Monat/1 GB Speicher/10 GB SSD-Speicherplatz/1 TB Datenverkehr/KVM/Seattle.
Darüber hinaus verfügt dieses Unternehmen auch über KVM VPS mit NVMe-SSD-Festplatte, die eine bessere Leistung bietet: IonSwitch: 22,5 $/Jahr/512 MB Speicher/5 GB NVMe-SSD-Speicherplatz/500 GB Datenverkehr/KVM/Seattle.
Die Henne hat 2x10Gb Bandbreite, E5-2670 Prozessor, RAID10 6 SSD, kostenlose Unterstützung für BGP, sehr gewissenhafte Konfiguration und ein sehr leistungsfähiges Netzwerk!

1. Systeminformationen, Bandbreite, I/O-Test

 CPU Model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz CPU Cores : 1 Cores @ 2599.998 MHz x86_64 CPU Cache : 4096 KB OS : Debian GNU/Linux 8 (64 Bit) KVM Kernel : 3.16.0-4-amd64 Total Space : 5.0 GB (1.2 GB Used) Total RAM : 494 MB (405 MB Used 34 MB Buff) Total SWAP : 0 MB (0 MB Used) Uptime : 0 days 9 hour 41 min Load average : 0.07, 0.02, 0.00 ASN & ISP : AS395970, IonSwitch, LLC Organization : IonSwitch, LLC Location : Seattle, United States / US Region : Washington ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 537 MB/s I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 739 MB/s I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 688 MB/s Average I/O Speed : 654.7 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Speedtest.net 153.34 Mbit/s 1145.49 Mbit/s 2.767 ms Shanghai CT 4.95 Mbit/s 17.88 Mbit/s 178.045 ms Kunming CT 11.90 Mbit/s 11.04 Mbit/s 420.834 ms Shanghai CU 26.04 Mbit/s 60.68 Mbit/s 208.984 ms Xi'an CU 57.18 Mbit/s 27.71 Mbit/s 337.714 ms Chongqing CU 64.63 Mbit/s 14.76 Mbit/s 211.614 ms Xi'an CM 29.94 Mbit/s 99.09 Mbit/s 265.233 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Finished in : 3 min 35 sec Timestamp : 2018-07-06 07:35:52 GMT+8

2. Upload-/Download-Bandbreitentest

 Retrieving speedtest.net server list... Selecting best server based on ping... Hosted by Wowrack (Seattle, WA) [13.38 km]: 3.331 ms Testing download speed........................ Download: 1041.75 Mbit/s Testing upload speed.......................... Upload: 216.94 Mbit/s

3. Inländische Zugangsgeschwindigkeit

4. Festplatten-E/A-Leistungstest

 dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 3.51365 s, 76.4 MB/s

5. UnixBench

 Benchmark Run: Thu Jul 05 2018 03:14:32 - 03:42:42 1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 27371427.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 3589.2 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 4042.4 lps (29.5 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 707898.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 209876.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1472793.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 1687449.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 276691.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 9865.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 6352.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 827.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 3835329.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 27371427.2 2345.5 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3589.2 652.6 Execl Throughput 43.0 4042.4 940.1 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 707898.8 1787.6 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 209876.0 1268.1 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1472793.8 2539.3 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1687449.2 1356.5 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 276691.0 691.7 Process Creation 126.0 9865.6 783.0 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6352.9 1498.3 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 827.6 1379.3 System Call Overhead 15000.0 3835329.8 2556.9 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1335.4

6. Paketverlusttest

 Ping from 192.168.0.29 to 104.192.xxx.xxx ============================================================================== 07/06 08:02:17.565 Ping to 104.192.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL: 07/06 08:02:17.798 PingMin #1 Reply 32 bytes from 104.192.xxx.xxx: time=227ms TTL=50, ave=227.00ms 07/06 08:02:18.785 PingMax #2 Reply 32 bytes from 104.192.xxx.xxx: time=228ms TTL=50, ave=227.50ms 07/06 08:02:22.789 PingMax #6 Reply 32 bytes from 104.192.xxx.xxx: time=229ms TTL=50, ave=227.83ms 07/06 08:02:23.805 PingMax #7 Reply 32 bytes from 104.192.xxx.xxx: time=241ms TTL=50, ave=229.71ms 07/06 08:02:27.806 PingMax #11 Reply 32 bytes from 104.192.xxx.xxx: time=250ms TTL=50, ave=231.00ms 07/06 08:02:31.816 PingMax #15 Reply 32 bytes from 104.192.xxx.xxx: time=256ms TTL=50, ave=232.07ms 07/06 08:02:59.840 PingMax #43 Reply 32 bytes from 104.192.xxx.xxx: time=278ms TTL=50, ave=232.53ms 07/06 08:03:05.909 PingMax #49 Reply 32 bytes from 104.192.xxx.xxx: time=353ms TTL=50, ave=234.98ms 07/06 08:03:08.111 PingMax #51 Reply 32 bytes from 104.192.xxx.xxx: time=550ms TTL=50, ave=242.96ms 07/06 08:03:56.789 === 100 有效發送, 100 接收, 0.00% 丟失, 239.85ms 平均值=== --- 結果& 統計信息------------------------------------------------------開始時間: 2018/07/06 08:02:17經過時間: 000:01:39結束時間: 2018/07/06 08:03:56 ---------------- 100 總計發送0 無效接收(除了超時的其它錯誤) ---------------- 100 有效發送100 有效接收0 timed out (0.00% 丟失) Ping 最小值227ms, 最大值550ms, 平均值239.85ms

7. Routenverfolgung <br /> Telekommunikation

China Unicom

8. YouTube-Geschwindigkeitstest