Kimsufi ks2 Atom N2800 4G Speicher 100M unbegrenzter Datenverkehr Französischer unabhängiger Server-Test

Details : Kimsufi: 3,99 €/Monat/D425/2 GB Speicher/500 GB Festplatte/unbegrenzte Daten/Kanada/Frankreich Das diesmal getestete Modell ist ks2, mit einer monatlichen Zahlung von 4,99 €. Es hat einen Preis gewonnen und eine 2 TB Festplatte bekommen. Für die Ping-, Routenverfolgungs- und UnixBench-Werte wurden die ks1-Daten aus der vorherigen Auswertung verwendet. Das Netzwerk von OVH Frankreich ist besser als das von Kanada. Dieser dedizierte Server kann für eine monatliche Gebühr von 50 Yuan gemietet werden. Bereits vermietet.
Willkommen zur TeleGram-Gruppendiskussion: https://t.me/zhujiwiki.

1. Systeminformationen, Bandbreite, I/O-Test

 CPU model : Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU N2800 @ 1.86GHz Number of cores : 4 CPU frequency : 1330.000 MHz Total size of Disk : 1863.2 GB (1.5 GB Used) Total amount of Mem : 3773 MB (85 MB Used) Total amount of Swap : 510 MB (0 MB Used) System uptime : 0 days 16 hour 29 min Load average : 0.01, 0.04, 0.05 OS : CentOS 7.5.1804 Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 3.10.0-862.3.2.el7.x86_64 Virt : No Virt Power time of disk : 31544 Hours ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O speed( 32M ) : 80.8 MB/s I/O speed( 256M ) : 95.9 MB/s I/O speed( 2G ) : 145 MB/s Average I/O speed : 107.2 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Normal Node 92.04 Mbit/s 87.84 Mbit/s 10.404 ms Xiangyang CT 58.89 Mbit/s 50.35 Mbit/s 431.148 ms Shanghai CT 14.32 Mbit/s 31.54 Mbit/s 363.977 ms Chengdu CT 0.00 Mbit/s 0.00 Mbit/s 000.000 ms Xi'an CU 6.06 Mbit/s 14.64 Mbit/s 525.677 ms Shanghai CU 5.67 Mbit/s 21.00 Mbit/s 362.031 ms Chongqing CU 3.85 Mbit/s 21.92 Mbit/s 746.904 ms Xi'an CM 52.78 Mbit/s 31.40 Mbit/s 521.329 ms Shanghai CM 2.40 Mbit/s 2.24 Mbit/s 556.145 ms Chengdu CM 27.97 Mbit/s 18.17 Mbit/s 312.754 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Total time : 5 min 30 sec Current time : 2018-06-14 08:55:47 Finished！

2. Upload-/Download-Bandbreitentest

 Retrieving speedtest.net server list... Selecting best server based on ping... Hosted by Orange (Paris) [1.88 km]: 9.484 ms Testing download speed................................. Download: 91.92 Mbit/s Testing upload speed................................... Upload: 92.35 Mbit/s

3. Inländische Zugangsgeschwindigkeit

4. Festplatten-E/A-Leistungstest

 dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 96.8292 s, 2.8 MB/s

5. UnixBench

 Benchmark Run: Tue Jun 12 2018 03:31:26 - 03:59:38 4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 6695626.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 729.1 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 762.1 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 113727.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 31568.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 325867.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 224478.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 41008.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 2486.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1413.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 366.7 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 518467.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 6695626.6 573.7 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 729.1 132.6 Execl Throughput 43.0 762.1 177.2 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 113727.7 287.2 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 31568.7 190.7 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 325867.5 561.8 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 224478.3 180.4 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 41008.6 102.5 Process Creation 126.0 2486.7 197.4 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 1413.5 333.4 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 366.7 611.1 System Call Overhead 15000.0 518467.3 345.6 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 262.4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Tue Jun 12 2018 03:59:38 - 04:27:55 4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 18980803.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 2569.3 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 1993.6 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 126637.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 34513.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 393874.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 569201.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 130881.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 6007.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 2844.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 384.2 lpm (60.3 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 1096664.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 18980803.5 1626.5 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2569.3 467.1 Execl Throughput 43.0 1993.6 463.6 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 126637.8 319.8 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 34513.4 208.5 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 393874.9 679.1 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 569201.9 457.6 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 130881.3 327.2 Process Creation 126.0 6007.6 476.8 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2844.2 670.8 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 384.2 640.3 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1096664.3 731.1 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 516.2

6. Paketverlusttest

 Ping from 192.168.16.243 to 176.31.xxx.xxx ============================================================================== 06/14 15:00:55.330 Ping to 176.31.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL: 06/14 15:00:55.893 PingMin #1 Reply 32 bytes from 176.31.xxx.xxx: time=557ms TTL=45, ave=557.00ms 06/14 15:00:56.902 PingMax #2 Reply 32 bytes from 176.31.xxx.xxx: time=579ms TTL=45, ave=568.00ms 06/14 15:01:01.882 PingMin #7 Reply 32 bytes from 176.31.xxx.xxx: time=556ms TTL=45, ave=566.00ms 06/14 15:01:04.878 PingMin #10 Reply 32 bytes from 176.31.xxx.xxx: time=555ms TTL=45, ave=565.50ms 06/14 15:01:06.905 PingMax #12 Reply 32 bytes from 176.31.xxx.xxx: time=583ms TTL=45, ave=566.17ms 06/14 15:01:16.916 PingMax #22 Reply 32 bytes from 176.31.xxx.xxx: time=590ms TTL=45, ave=567.45ms 06/14 15:01:18.100 超時#23 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/14 15:01:21.919 PingMax #27 Reply 32 bytes from 176.31.xxx.xxx: time=595ms TTL=45, ave=568.88ms 06/14 15:01:34.938 PingMax #40 Reply 32 bytes from 176.31.xxx.xxx: time=613ms TTL=45, ave=572.26ms 06/14 15:02:19.869 PingMin #85 Reply 32 bytes from 176.31.xxx.xxx: time=543ms TTL=45, ave=572.12ms 06/14 15:02:34.913 === 100 有效發送, 99 接收, 1.00% 丟失, 572.46ms 平均值=== --- 結果& 統計信息------------------------------------------------------開始時間: 2018/06/14 15:00:55經過時間: 000:01:39結束時間: 2018/06/14 15:02:34 ---------------- 100 總計發送0 無效接收(除了超時的其它錯誤) ---------------- 100 有效發送99 有效接收1 timed out (1.00% 丟失) Ping 最小值543ms, 最大值613ms, 平均值572.46ms

7. Routenverfolgung <br /> Telekommunikation

China Unicom

bewegen

8. YouTube-Geschwindigkeitstest

9. Festplattengröße und Nutzungsdauer