|
Details: Kimsufi: 3,99 €/Monat/D425/2 GB Speicher/500 GB Festplatte/unbegrenzte Daten/Kanada/Frankreich. Das getestete Modell ist ks1 mit einer monatlichen Zahlung von 3,99 € und einer 500 GB Festplatte. Das Netzwerk von OVH Frankreich ist besser als das von Kanada. Dieser dedizierte Server kann gemietet und für eine monatliche Zahlung von 35 Yuan gebucht werden.
Willkommen zur TeleGram-Gruppendiskussion: https://t.me/zhujiwiki; wenn Sie im Namen anderer kaufen möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an: https://t.me/t66y_net oder QQ: 202730019 1. Systeminformationen, Bandbreite, I/O-Test CPU model : Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU N2800 @ 1.86GHz Number of cores : 4 CPU frequency : 1866.623 MHz Total size of Disk : 912.5 GB (3.8 GB Used) Total amount of Mem : 1988 MB (1294 MB Used) Total amount of Swap : 2012 MB (0 MB Used) System uptime : 0 days 11 hour 10 min Load average : 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 OS : CentOS 6.9 Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 2.6.32-696.30.1.el6.x86_64 Virt : No Virt Power time of disk : Hours ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O speed( 32M ) : 64.5 MB/s I/O speed( 256M ) : 75.3 MB/s I/O speed( 2G ) : 96.7 MB/s Average I/O speed : 78.8 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Normal Node 93.59 Mbit/s 90.55 Mbit/s 11.321 ms Xiangyang CT 23.16 Mbit/s 37.13 Mbit/s 300.48 ms Shanghai CT 22.73 Mbit/s 25.42 Mbit/s 633.914 ms Chengdu CT 38.46 Mbit/s 26.86 Mbit/s 000.000 ms Xi'an CU 9.62 Mbit/s 10.09 Mbit/s 386.273 ms Shanghai CU 9.09 Mbit/s 21.67 Mbit/s 358.182 ms Chongqing CU 0.59 Mbit/s 2.87 Mbit/s 000.000 ms Xi'an CM 21.41 Mbit/s 28.07 Mbit/s 617.788 ms Shanghai CM 3.42 Mbit/s 2.18 Mbit/s 581.014 ms Chengdu CM 16.58 Mbit/s 17.15 Mbit/s 316.374 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Total time : 5 min 32 sec Current time : 2018-06-12 03:21:46 Finished！ 2. Upload-/Download-Bandbreitentest Retrieving speedtest.net server list... Selecting best server based on ping... Hosted by SiriusHD (Paris) [1.88 km]: 10.609 ms Testing download speed......................... Download: 93.48 Mbit/s Testing upload speed........................... Upload: 58.28 Mbit/s 3. Inländische Zugangsgeschwindigkeit
4. Festplatten-E/A-Leistungstest dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 210.715 s, 1.3 MB/s 5. UnixBench Benchmark Run: Tue Jun 12 2018 03:31:26 - 03:59:38 4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 6695626.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 729.1 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 762.1 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 113727.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 31568.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 325867.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 224478.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 41008.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 2486.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1413.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 366.7 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 518467.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 6695626.6 573.7 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 729.1 132.6 Execl Throughput 43.0 762.1 177.2 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 113727.7 287.2 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 31568.7 190.7 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 325867.5 561.8 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 224478.3 180.4 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 41008.6 102.5 Process Creation 126.0 2486.7 197.4 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 1413.5 333.4 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 366.7 611.1 System Call Overhead 15000.0 518467.3 345.6 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 262.4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Tue Jun 12 2018 03:59:38 - 04:27:55 4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 18980803.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 2569.3 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 1993.6 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 126637.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 34513.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 393874.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 569201.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 130881.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 6007.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 2844.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 384.2 lpm (60.3 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 1096664.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 18980803.5 1626.5 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2569.3 467.1 Execl Throughput 43.0 1993.6 463.6 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 126637.8 319.8 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 34513.4 208.5 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 393874.9 679.1 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 569201.9 457.6 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 130881.3 327.2 Process Creation 126.0 6007.6 476.8 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2844.2 670.8 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 384.2 640.3 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1096664.3 731.1 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 516.2 6. Paketverlusttest Ping from 192.168.16.243 to 37.187.xxx.xxx ============================================================================== 06/12 09:33:27.542 Ping to 37.187.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL: 06/12 09:33:27.903 PingMin #1 Reply 32 bytes from 37.187.xxx.xxx: time=357ms TTL=42, ave=357.00ms 06/12 09:33:30.892 PingMin #4 Reply 32 bytes from 37.187.xxx.xxx: time=356ms TTL=42, ave=356.75ms 06/12 09:33:32.891 PingMin #6 Reply 32 bytes from 37.187.xxx.xxx: time=355ms TTL=42, ave=356.33ms 06/12 09:33:33.888 PingMin #7 Reply 32 bytes from 37.187.xxx.xxx: time=354ms TTL=42, ave=356.00ms 06/12 09:33:34.904 PingMax #8 Reply 32 bytes from 37.187.xxx.xxx: time=361ms TTL=42, ave=356.63ms 06/12 09:33:37.909 PingMax #11 Reply 32 bytes from 37.187.xxx.xxx: time=373ms TTL=42, ave=357.82ms 06/12 09:34:30.251 超時#63 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/12 09:35:07.927 === 100 有效發送, 99 接收, 1.00% 丟失, 355.81ms 平均值=== --- 結果& 統計信息------------------------------------------------------開始時間: 2018/06/12 09:33:27經過時間: 000:01:40結束時間: 2018/06/12 09:35:07 ---------------- 100 總計發送0 無效接收(除了超時的其它錯誤) ---------------- 100 有效發送99 有效接收1 timed out (1.00% 丟失) Ping 最小值354ms, 最大值373ms, 平均值355.81ms 7. Routenverfolgung <br /> Telekommunikation
China Unicom
bewegen
8. YouTube-Geschwindigkeitstest
|
