Clouvider 2 GB RAM UK KVM VPS-Testbericht

Details: Clouvider: 10,5 £/Monat/2 GB RAM/30 GB SSD-Speicherplatz/unbegrenzter Datenverkehr/1 Gbit/s/UK/IP-Änderung jederzeit möglich
Die IP kann jederzeit geändert werden, der Datenverkehr ist mit 1 Gbit/s unbegrenzt, das Netzwerk ist gut und Alipay wird unterstützt. Abgesehen vom hohen Preis (aber es gibt Rabatte während Festivals, ich habe dies mit 25 % Rabatt gekauft) gibt es fast keine Nachteile.

1. Systeminformationen, Bandbreite, I/O-Test

 CPU model : Intel Core Processor (Broadwell) Number of cores : 2 CPU frequency : 2399.996 MHz Total size of Disk : 30.0 GB (0.9 GB Used) Total amount of Mem : 1999 MB (148 MB Used) Total amount of Swap : 0 MB (0 MB Used) System uptime : 0 days 0 hour 2 min Load average : 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 OS : CentOS 7.0.1406 Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 3.10.0-229.14.1.el7.centos.plus.x86_64 Virt : kvm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O speed( 32M ) : 105 MB/s I/O speed( 256M ) : 127 MB/s I/O speed( 2G ) : 189 MB/s Average I/O speed : 140.3 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Normal Node 613.73 Mbit/s 904.23 Mbit/s 2.41 ms Xiangyang CT 75.26 Mbit/s 48.27 Mbit/s 292.651 ms Shanghai CT 24.16 Mbit/s 17.44 Mbit/s 304.823 ms Chengdu CT 18.16 Mbit/s 4.79 Mbit/s 000.000 ms Xi'an CU 5.64 Mbit/s 18.41 Mbit/s 362.398 ms Shanghai CU 9.45 Mbit/s 7.71 Mbit/s 316.622 ms Chongqing CU 0.00 Mbit/s 0.00 Mbit/s 000.000 ms Xi'an CM 20.26 Mbit/s 22.06 Mbit/s 850.834 ms Shanghai CM 2.91 Mbit/s 16.90 Mbit/s 405.296 ms Chengdu CM 17.87 Mbit/s 13.01 Mbit/s 327.356 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Total time : 4 min 7 sec Current time : 2018-05-22 06:37:13 Finished！

2. Upload-/Download-Bandbreitentest

 Retrieving speedtest.net server list... Selecting best server based on ping... Hosted by KamaTera INC (London) [2.56 km]: 2.629 ms Testing download speed........................................... Download: 902.03 Mbit/s Testing upload speed............................................ Upload: 663.99 Mbit/s

3. Inländische Zugangsgeschwindigkeit

4. Festplatten-E/A-Leistungstest

 dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 22.0148 s, 12.2 MB/s

5. UnixBench

 Benchmark Run: Tue May 22 2018 06:39:07 - 07:07:17 2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 23629377.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 4028.8 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 984.1 lps (29.6 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 610615.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 185558.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1723791.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 1217318.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 247545.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 4900.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 2872.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 800.7 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 1871891.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 23629377.5 2024.8 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4028.8 732.5 Execl Throughput 43.0 984.1 228.9 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 610615.0 1542.0 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 185558.1 1121.2 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1723791.3 2972.1 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1217318.1 978.6 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 247545.0 618.9 Process Creation 126.0 4900.3 388.9 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2872.6 677.5 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 800.7 1334.4 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1871891.3 1247.9 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 937.9 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Tue May 22 2018 07:07:17 - 07:35:28 2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 42758627.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 7882.2 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 4985.4 lps (29.7 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 844718.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 238312.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2532431.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 2487308.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 461951.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 14402.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 7568.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1111.6 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 3119681.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 42758627.2 3664.0 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 7882.2 1433.1 Execl Throughput 43.0 4985.4 1159.4 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 844718.8 2133.1 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 238312.2 1440.0 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2532431.9 4366.3 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2487308.6 1999.4 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 461951.8 1154.9 Process Creation 126.0 14402.4 1143.0 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 7568.7 1785.1 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1111.6 1852.6 System Call Overhead 15000.0 3119681.9 2079.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1837.6

6. Paketverlusttest

 Ping from 192.168.16.243 to 185.42.xxx.xxx ============================================================================== 05/22 08:50:34.360 Ping to 185.42.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL: 05/22 08:50:34.672 PingMin #1 Reply 32 bytes from 185.42.xxx.xxx: time=307ms TTL=49, ave=307.00ms 05/22 08:50:35.665 PingMin #2 Reply 32 bytes from 185.42.xxx.xxx: time=306ms TTL=49, ave=306.50ms 05/22 08:50:42.671 PingMax #9 Reply 32 bytes from 185.42.xxx.xxx: time=309ms TTL=49, ave=306.78ms 05/22 08:50:43.677 PingMax #10 Reply 32 bytes from 185.42.xxx.xxx: time=316ms TTL=49, ave=307.70ms 05/22 08:50:58.355 超時#24 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 05/22 08:51:07.684 PingMax #34 Reply 32 bytes from 185.42.xxx.xxx: time=319ms TTL=49, ave=308.09ms 05/22 08:51:57.355 超時#83 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 05/22 08:52:13.666 === 100 有效發送, 98 接收, 2.00% 丟失, 307.60ms 平均值=== --- 結果& 統計信息------------------------------------------------------開始時間: 2018/05/22 08:50:34經過時間: 000:01:39結束時間: 2018/05/22 08:52:13 ---------------- 100 總計發送0 無效接收(除了超時的其它錯誤) ---------------- 100 有效發送98 有效接收2 timed out (2.00% 丟失) Ping 最小值306ms, 最大值319ms, 平均值307.60ms

7. Routenverfolgung <br /> Telekommunikation

China Unicom

8. YouTube-Geschwindigkeitstest