|
Details: HiFormance: 10 $/Jahr/2 GB Speicher/20 GB SSD-Speicherplatz/2 TB Datenverkehr/OpenVZ/Los Angeles. Ich habe Chicago OVZ VPS bereits getestet (HiFormance 2 GB Speicher SSD-Festplatte Chicago OpenVZ VPS Test). Das Netzwerk ist durchschnittlich. Seit wir nach Los Angeles gewechselt sind, sind Leistung und Netz deutlich besser. Für das 10-Dollar-2G-Modell empfehle ich Los Angeles. 1. Systeminformationen, Bandbreite, I/O-Test CPU model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz Number of cores : 2 CPU frequency : 3499.669 MHz Total size of Disk : 20.0 GB (0.7 GB Used) Total amount of Mem : 2048 MB (500 MB Used) Total amount of Swap : 2048 MB (0 MB Used) System uptime : 0 days 2 hour 36 min Load average : 0.10, 0.18, 0.08 OS : CentOS 6.9 Arch : i686 (32 Bit) Kernel : 2.6.32-042stab128.2 Virt : openvz ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O speed( 32M ) : 138 MB/s I/O speed( 256M ) : 293 MB/s I/O speed( 2G ) : 806 MB/s Average I/O speed : 412.3 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Normal Node 379.75 Mbit/s 635.60 Mbit/s 25.066 ms Xiangyang CT 5.18 Mbit/s 14.29 Mbit/s 776.289 ms Shanghai CT 37.72 Mbit/s 69.45 Mbit/s 168.775 ms Chengdu CT 1.46 Mbit/s 8.80 Mbit/s 585.394 ms Xi'an CU 13.87 Mbit/s 86.94 Mbit/s 345.357 ms Shanghai CU 17.83 Mbit/s 129.56 Mbit/s 194.269 ms Chongqing CU 25.18 Mbit/s 126.95 Mbit/s 193.019 ms Xi'an CM 57.18 Mbit/s 289.37 Mbit/s 138.897 ms Shanghai CM 0.98 Mbit/s 2.47 Mbit/s 281.543 ms Chengdu CM 0.92 Mbit/s 1.13 Mbit/s 316.663 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Total time : 4 min 26 sec Current time : 2018-05-14 02:47:48 Finished！ 2. Upload-/Download-Bandbreitentest Retrieving speedtest.net server list... Selecting best server based on ping... Hosted by Janus Networks (San Jose, CA) [4.19 km]: 21.405 ms Testing download speed....................................... Download: 568.66 Mbit/s Testing upload speed......................................... Upload: 292.05 Mbit/s 3. Inländische Zugangsgeschwindigkeit
4. Festplatten-E/A-Leistungstest dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 32.0048 s, 8.4 MB/s 5. UnixBench Benchmark Run: Mon May 14 2018 02:53:45 - 03:22:15 2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 23721205.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 3285.7 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 3211.9 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 389444.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 111335.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1266287.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 715861.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 145833.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 9215.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3504.0 lpm (60.2 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 755.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 620387.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 23721205.9 2032.7 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3285.7 597.4 Execl Throughput 43.0 3211.9 746.9 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 389444.0 983.4 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 111335.2 672.7 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1266287.0 2183.3 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 715861.1 575.5 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 145833.4 364.6 Process Creation 126.0 9215.7 731.4 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3504.0 826.4 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 755.4 1259.0 System Call Overhead 15000.0 620387.4 413.6 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 815.5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Mon May 14 2018 03:22:15 - 03:50:49 2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 45626901.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 6606.6 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 8045.5 lps (29.7 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 463749.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 123544.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1326046.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 1277287.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 296384.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 16763.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 7084.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 964.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 1157567.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 45626901.3 3909.8 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 6606.6 1201.2 Execl Throughput 43.0 8045.5 1871.0 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 463749.3 1171.1 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 123544.7 746.5 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1326046.0 2286.3 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1277287.4 1026.8 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 296384.3 741.0 Process Creation 126.0 16763.7 1330.5 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 7084.0 1670.8 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 964.8 1608.0 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1157567.9 771.7 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1350.6 6. Paketverlusttest Ping from 192.168.16.243 to 107.174.xxx.xxx ============================================================================== 05/14 15:03:50.864 Ping to 107.174.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL: 05/14 15:03:51.056 PingMin #1 Reply 32 bytes from 107.174.xxx.xxx: time=187ms TTL=51, ave=187.00ms 05/14 15:03:53.052 PingMax #3 Reply 32 bytes from 107.174.xxx.xxx: time=189ms TTL=51, ave=187.67ms 05/14 15:03:54.063 PingMax #4 Reply 32 bytes from 107.174.xxx.xxx: time=195ms TTL=51, ave=189.50ms 05/14 15:03:57.049 PingMin #7 Reply 32 bytes from 107.174.xxx.xxx: time=186ms TTL=51, ave=188.29ms 05/14 15:04:09.057 PingMax #19 Reply 32 bytes from 107.174.xxx.xxx: time=196ms TTL=51, ave=188.68ms 05/14 15:04:11.068 PingMax #21 Reply 32 bytes from 107.174.xxx.xxx: time=204ms TTL=51, ave=189.71ms 05/14 15:04:51.077 PingMax #61 Reply 32 bytes from 107.174.xxx.xxx: time=209ms TTL=51, ave=188.93ms 05/14 15:05:30.051 === 100 有效發送, 100 接收, 0.00% 丟失, 189.18ms 平均值=== --- 結果& 統計信息------------------------------------------------------開始時間: 2018/05/14 15:03:50經過時間: 000:01:39結束時間: 2018/05/14 15:05:30 ---------------- 100 總計發送0 無效接收(除了超時的其它錯誤) ---------------- 100 有效發送100 有效接收0 timed out (0.00% 丟失) Ping 最小值186ms, 最大值209ms, 平均值189.18ms 7. Routenverfolgung <br /> Telekommunikation
China Unicom
|
