Details: Tospeed: 24 Yuan/Monat/512 MB Speicher/150 GB Speicherplatz/4 TB Datenverkehr/KVM/Nowosibirsk-Netzwerk ist sehr gut, kostengünstig, E/A ist ein großer Nachteil, schließlich handelt es sich um eine einzelne Festplatte. 1. Systeminformationen, Bandbreite, I/O-Test CPU model : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) Number of cores : 1 CPU frequency : 4199.996 MHz Total size of Disk : 98.0 GB (1.0 GB Used) Total amount of Mem : 490 MB (225 MB Used) Total amount of Swap : 511 MB (0 MB Used) System uptime : 0 days 0 hour 7 min Load average : 0.34, 0.62, 0.35 OS : CentOS 6.9 Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 2.6.32-696.23.1.el6.x86_64 Virt : kvm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O speed( 32M ) : 15.8 MB/s I/O speed( 256M ) : 8.7 MB/s I/O speed( 2G ) : 9.4 MB/s Average I/O speed : 11.3 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Normal Node 7.34 Mbit/s 40.90 Mbit/s 217.766 ms Xiangyang CT 57.45 Mbit/s 176.66 Mbit/s 381.196 ms Xi'an CU 43.25 Mbit/s 179.10 Mbit/s 299.329 ms Shanghai CU 66.37 Mbit/s 251.23 Mbit/s 122.072 ms Chongqing CU 66.67 Mbit/s 81.91 Mbit/s 465.397 ms Xi'an CM 5.80 Mbit/s 19.83 Mbit/s 445.232 ms Shanghai CM 3.66 Mbit/s 1.24 Mbit/s 381.742 ms Chengdu CM 5.33 Mbit/s 1.08 Mbit/s 657.768 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Total time : 11 min 15 sec Current time : 2018-04-30 22:33:17 Finished! Update 1. Mai 2018: CPU model : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) Number of cores : 1 CPU frequency : 4199.996 MHz Total size of Disk : 98.0 GB (1.3 GB Used) Total amount of Mem : 485 MB (413 MB Used) Total amount of Swap : 511 MB (0 MB Used) System uptime : 0 days, 7 hour 46 min Load average : 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 OS : CentOS 6.9 Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 4.9.75-30.el6.x86_64 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O speed(1st run) : 45.1 MB/s I/O speed(2nd run) : 61.6 MB/s I/O speed(3rd run) : 62.3 MB/s Average I/O speed : 56.3 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name IPv4 address Download Speed CacheFly 205.234.175.175 11.4MB/s Linode, Tokyo, JP 106.187.96.148 12.6MB/s Linode, Singapore, SG 139.162.23.4 4.82MB/s Linode, London, UK 176.58.107.39 12.2MB/s Linode, Frankfurt, DE 139.162.130.8 12.5MB/s Linode, Fremont, CA 50.116.14.9 1.60MB/s Softlayer, Dallas, TX 173.192.68.18 5.78MB/s Softlayer, Seattle, WA 67.228.112.250 4.77MB/s Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE 159.122.69.4 8.46MB/s Softlayer, Singapore, SG 119.81.28.170 2.99MB/s Softlayer, HongKong, CN 119.81.130.170 8.78MB/s 2. Upload-/Download-Bandbreitentest Selecting best server based on ping... Hosted by Beijing Telecom (Beijing) [1.69 km]: 220.989 ms Testing download speed.................. Download: 69.73 Mbit/s Testing upload speed.................... Upload: 66.72 Mbit/s 3. Inländische Zugangsgeschwindigkeit
4. Festplatten-E/A-Leistungstest dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync ^C1578+0 records in 1578+0 records out 103415808 bytes (103 MB) copied, 1015.48 s, 102 kB/s Update 1. Mai 2018: dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 349.582 s, 768 kB/s 5. UnixBench Benchmark Run: Mon Apr 30 2018 22:58:25 - 23:28:22 1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 51681130.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 3303.3 MWIPS (15.7 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 5922.5 lps (29.6 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 625688.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 170101.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1875298.8 KBps (30.1 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 1103756.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 326876.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 20538.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 7739.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1029.4 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 878934.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 51681130.1 4428.5 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3303.3 600.6 Execl Throughput 43.0 5922.5 1377.3 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 625688.9 1580.0 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 170101.4 1027.8 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1875298.8 3233.3 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1103756.7 887.3 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 326876.4 817.2 Process Creation 126.0 20538.0 1630.0 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 7739.0 1825.2 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1029.4 1715.7 System Call Overhead 15000.0 878934.4 586.0 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1364.7 6. Paketverlusttest Ping from 10.0.0.16 to 185.173.xxx.xxx ============================================================================== 04/30 22:50:13.073 Ping to 185.173.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL: 04/30 22:50:13.208 PingMin #1 Reply 32 bytes from 185.173.xxx.xxx: time=128ms TTL=54, ave=128.00ms 04/30 22:50:15.195 PingMin #3 Reply 32 bytes from 185.173.xxx.xxx: time=127ms TTL=54, ave=127.67ms 04/30 22:50:20.200 PingMax #8 Reply 32 bytes from 185.173.xxx.xxx: time=130ms TTL=54, ave=127.88ms 04/30 22:50:22.199 PingMin #10 Reply 32 bytes from 185.173.xxx.xxx: time=126ms TTL=54, ave=127.60ms 04/30 22:50:40.208 PingMax #28 Reply 32 bytes from 185.173.xxx.xxx: time=135ms TTL=54, ave=127.64ms 04/30 22:50:45.205 PingMax #33 Reply 32 bytes from 185.173.xxx.xxx: time=137ms TTL=54, ave=128.00ms 04/30 22:51:38.224 PingMax #86 Reply 32 bytes from 185.173.xxx.xxx: time=147ms TTL=54, ave=128.09ms 04/30 22:51:52.196 === 100 有效發送, 100 接收, 0.00% 丟失, 127.99ms 平均值=== --- 結果& 統計信息------------------------------------------------------開始時間: 2018/04/30 22:50:13經過時間: 000:01:39結束時間: 2018/04/30 22:51:52 ---------------- 100 總計發送0 無效接收(除了超時的其它錯誤) ---------------- 100 有效發送100 有效接收0 timed out (0.00% 丟失) Ping 最小值126ms, 最大值147ms, 平均值127.99ms 7. Routenverfolgung <br /> Telekommunikation
China Unicom
bewegen
8. YouTube-Geschwindigkeitstest
|