|
Details: WootHosting: 18 $/Jahr/1 GB Speicher/30 GB Speicherplatz/3 TB Datenverkehr/KVM/Chicago/New York/Los Angeles
WootHosting Chicago VPS wird im Rechenzentrum von servercentral.com (eigentlich immer noch cc) gehostet und die Inlandsgeschwindigkeit ist ziemlich gut.
Bei derartigen preisgünstigen VPS-Händlern empfiehlt es sich im Allgemeinen, weniger beliebte Anbieter wie die Ostküste der USA zu wählen, wo die Ping-Rate nicht gut, die Geschwindigkeit jedoch hoch ist, und eine Überfüllung der Westküste der USA (wo die Ping-Rate gut, die Geschwindigkeit jedoch niedrig ist) zu vermeiden. 1. Systeminformationen, Bandbreite, I/O-Test CPU model : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) Number of cores : 2 CPU frequency : 2400.084 MHz Total size of Disk : 48.0 GB (0.9 GB Used) Total amount of Mem : 2010 MB (238 MB Used) Total amount of Swap : 2047 MB (0 MB Used) System uptime : 0 days 0 hour 4 min Load average : 0.19, 0.15, 0.06 OS : Debian GNU/Linux 8 Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 3.16.0-4-amd64 Virt : kvm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O speed( 32M ) : 241 MB/s I/O speed( 256M ) : 77.4 MB/s I/O speed( 2G ) : 115 MB/s Average I/O speed : 144.5 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Normal Node 64.72 Mbit/s 78.41 Mbit/s 23.638 ms Xiangyang CT 19.37 Mbit/s 20.32 Mbit/s 380.134 ms Chengdu CT 30.30 Mbit/s 28.18 Mbit/s 254.232 ms Xi'an CU 27.91 Mbit/s 12.31 Mbit/s 359.396 ms Shanghai CU 21.08 Mbit/s 5.27 Mbit/s 247.509 ms Chongqing CU 17.10 Mbit/s 10.22 Mbit/s 315.358 ms Xi'an CM 30.44 Mbit/s 16.28 Mbit/s 278.109 ms Shanghai CM 17.25 Mbit/s 9.34 Mbit/s 241.113 ms Chengdu CM 22.84 Mbit/s 11.36 Mbit/s 278.677 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Total time : 4 min 22 sec Current time : 2018-04-22 18:53:27 Finished！ 2. Upload-/Download-Bandbreitentest Retrieving speedtest.net server list... Selecting best server based on ping... Hosted by InnSys Inc (Toronto, ON) [94.56 km]: 22.524 ms Testing download speed................................................................................ Download: 80.66 Mbit/s Testing upload speed................................................................................................ Upload: 102.42 Mbit/s 3. Inländische Zugangsgeschwindigkeit
4. Festplatten-E/A-Leistungstest dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 7.59933 s, 35.3 MB/s 5. UnixBench Benchmark Run: Sun Apr 22 2018 19:06:56 - 19:34:58 2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 19543082.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 2777.7 MWIPS (9.1 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 836.7 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 540167.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 159496.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1095607.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 1346548.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 186406.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 2816.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3471.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 969.0 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 2777460.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 19543082.5 1674.6 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2777.7 505.0 Execl Throughput 43.0 836.7 194.6 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 540167.4 1364.1 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 159496.8 963.7 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1095607.6 1889.0 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1346548.4 1082.4 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 186406.3 466.0 Process Creation 126.0 2816.7 223.5 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3471.7 818.8 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 969.0 1615.1 System Call Overhead 15000.0 2777460.4 1851.6 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 833.8 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Sun Apr 22 2018 19:34:58 - 20:03:08 2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 35504731.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 5405.3 MWIPS (9.6 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 4961.6 lps (29.5 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 753528.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 187342.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1762778.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 2547226.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 348665.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 8736.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 6675.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1189.7 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 4262132.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 35504731.5 3042.4 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 5405.3 982.8 Execl Throughput 43.0 4961.6 1153.9 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 753528.5 1902.8 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 187342.6 1132.0 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1762778.9 3039.3 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2547226.7 2047.6 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 348665.4 871.7 Process Creation 126.0 8736.6 693.4 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6675.8 1574.5 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1189.7 1982.8 System Call Overhead 15000.0 4262132.3 2841.4 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1583.2 6. Paketverlusttest Ping from 192.168.0.29 to 75.102.xxx.xxx ============================================================================== 04/23 09:01:40.380 Ping to 75.102.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL: 04/23 09:01:40.621 PingMin #1 Reply 32 bytes from 75.102.xxx.xxx: time=237ms TTL=43, ave=237.00ms 04/23 09:01:41.634 PingMax #2 Reply 32 bytes from 75.102.xxx.xxx: time=250ms TTL=43, ave=243.50ms 04/23 09:01:45.642 PingMax #6 Reply 32 bytes from 75.102.xxx.xxx: time=261ms TTL=43, ave=245.33ms 04/23 09:01:46.619 PingMin #7 Reply 32 bytes from 75.102.xxx.xxx: time=236ms TTL=43, ave=244.00ms 04/23 09:01:48.682 PingMax #9 Reply 32 bytes from 75.102.xxx.xxx: time=300ms TTL=43, ave=249.33ms 04/23 09:02:11.619 PingMin #32 Reply 32 bytes from 75.102.xxx.xxx: time=235ms TTL=43, ave=246.03ms 04/23 09:02:51.890 PingMax #72 Reply 32 bytes from 75.102.xxx.xxx: time=506ms TTL=43, ave=249.53ms 04/23 09:03:19.621 === 100 有效發送, 100 接收, 0.00% 丟失, 250.78ms 平均值=== --- 結果& 統計信息------------------------------------------------------開始時間: 2018/04/23 09:01:40經過時間: 000:01:39結束時間: 2018/04/23 09:03:19 ---------------- 100 總計發送0 無效接收(除了超時的其它錯誤) ---------------- 100 有效發送100 有效接收0 timed out (0.00% 丟失) Ping 最小值235ms, 最大值506ms, 平均值250.78ms 7. Routenverfolgung <br /> Telekommunikation
China Unicom
8. YouTube-Geschwindigkeitstest
|
