Yiyun 1,8 GB RAM 3 Mbit/s Hong Kong Xen VPS-Testbericht

Yiyun 1,8 GB RAM 3 Mbit/s Hong Kong Xen VPS-Testbericht

Konfiguration: CPU: 2 CPUs, Speicher: 1792 M, Festplatte: 50 G, Port: 3 M, Verkehr: unbegrenzt, Xen, unterstützt Win
Die Upstream-Geschwindigkeit dieses Modells beträgt 3 Mbit/s und die Downstream-Geschwindigkeit 100 Mbit/s.
Abgelaufen am 06.06.2019, Verlängerungsgebühr beträgt 360 Yuan, 260 Yuan bezahlt, bitte kontaktieren Sie uns bei Bedarf.

1. Systeminformationen, Bandbreite, I/O-Test

 CPU model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5630 @ 2.13GHz Number of cores : 2 CPU frequency : 2133.458 MHz Total size of Disk : 49.0 GB (1.2 GB Used) Total amount of Mem : 1742 MB (81 MB Used) Total amount of Swap : 1023 MB (0 MB Used) System uptime : 1 days 16 hour 58 min Load average : 0.00, 0.01, 0.05 OS : CentOS 7.1.1503 Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 3.10.0-229.7.2.el7.x86_64 Virt : xen xen-domU ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O speed( 32M ) : 44.4 MB/s I/O speed( 256M ) : 55.0 MB/s I/O speed( 2G ) : 53.7 MB/s Average I/O speed : 51.0 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Normal Node 2.74 Mbit/s 88.94 Mbit/s 9.438 ms Xiangyang CT 2.74 Mbit/s 21.07 Mbit/s 61.705 ms Chengdu CT 2.69 Mbit/s 20.89 Mbit/s 44.813 ms Xi'an CU 2.69 Mbit/s 20.61 Mbit/s 75.071 ms Shanghai CU 2.68 Mbit/s 21.17 Mbit/s 34.71 ms Chongqing CU 2.65 Mbit/s 21.54 Mbit/s 42.231 ms Xi'an CM 2.68 Mbit/s 59.79 Mbit/s 37.613 ms Shanghai CM 2.73 Mbit/s 21.36 Mbit/s 81.266 ms Chengdu CM 2.65 Mbit/s 14.55 Mbit/s 67.09 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Total time : 4 min 58 sec Current time : 2018-04-16 14:02:54 Finished!

2. Upload-/Download-Bandbreitentest

 Retrieving speedtest.net server list... Selecting best server based on ping... Hosted by STC (Hong Kong) [0.00 km]: 9.267 ms Testing download speed................................................................................ Download: 90.91 Mbit/s Testing upload speed................................................................................................ Upload: 2.76 Mbit/s

3. Inländische Zugangsgeschwindigkeit

4. Festplatten-E/A-Leistungstest

 dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 165.77 s, 1.6 MB/s

5. UnixBench

 Benchmark Run: Mon Apr 16 2018 14:18:28 - 14:46:53 2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 20046080.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 2672.0 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 817.5 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 188006.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 49399.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 576511.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 248050.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 25725.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 1719.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1193.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 368.3 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 335571.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 20046080.9 1717.7 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2672.0 485.8 Execl Throughput 43.0 817.5 190.1 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 188006.7 474.8 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 49399.9 298.5 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 576511.7 994.0 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 248050.1 199.4 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 25725.8 64.3 Process Creation 126.0 1719.3 136.5 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 1193.4 281.5 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 368.3 613.9 System Call Overhead 15000.0 335571.4 223.7 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 327.3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Mon Apr 16 2018 14:46:53 - 15:15:15 2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 38448401.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 5235.5 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 1450.3 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 308421.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 83686.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1007136.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 475747.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 85905.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 3157.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1570.3 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 399.9 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 606126.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 38448401.0 3294.6 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 5235.5 951.9 Execl Throughput 43.0 1450.3 337.3 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 308421.2 778.8 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 83686.5 505.7 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1007136.9 1736.4 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 475747.1 382.4 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 85905.7 214.8 Process Creation 126.0 3157.9 250.6 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 1570.3 370.3 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 399.9 666.5 System Call Overhead 15000.0 606126.9 404.1 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 581.2

6. Paketverlusttest

 Ping from 192.168.0.29 to 103.233.xxx.xxx ============================================================================== 04/16 14:06:47.498 Ping to 103.233.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL: 04/16 14:06:47.566 PingMin #1 Reply 32 bytes from 103.233.xxx.xxx: time=66ms TTL=51, ave=66.00ms 04/16 14:06:48.572 PingMax #2 Reply 32 bytes from 103.233.xxx.xxx: time=76ms TTL=51, ave=71.00ms 04/16 14:06:49.639 PingMax #3 Reply 32 bytes from 103.233.xxx.xxx: time=148ms TTL=51, ave=96.67ms 04/16 14:06:50.559 PingMin #4 Reply 32 bytes from 103.233.xxx.xxx: time=65ms TTL=51, ave=88.75ms 04/16 14:06:52.653 PingMax #6 Reply 32 bytes from 103.233.xxx.xxx: time=159ms TTL=51, ave=96.67ms 04/16 14:06:56.551 PingMin #10 Reply 32 bytes from 103.233.xxx.xxx: time=58ms TTL=51, ave=85.40ms 04/16 14:07:00.554 PingMin #14 Reply 32 bytes from 103.233.xxx.xxx: time=57ms TTL=51, ave=77.86ms 04/16 14:07:50.661 PingMax #64 Reply 32 bytes from 103.233.xxx.xxx: time=169ms TTL=51, ave=73.30ms 04/16 14:08:00.664 PingMax #74 Reply 32 bytes from 103.233.xxx.xxx: time=174ms TTL=51, ave=73.20ms 04/16 14:08:26.555 === 100 有效發送, 100 接收, 0.00% 丟失, 72.50ms 平均值=== --- 結果& 統計信息------------------------------------------------------開始時間: 2018/04/16 14:06:47經過時間: 000:01:39結束時間: 2018/04/16 14:08:26 ---------------- 100 總計發送0 無效接收(除了超時的其它錯誤) ---------------- 100 有效發送100 有效接收0 timed out (0.00% 丟失) Ping 最小值57ms, 最大值174ms, 平均值72.50ms

7. Routenverfolgung <br />Telekommunikation

China Unicom

8. YouTube-Geschwindigkeitstest

<<:  Windows VPS: 25 $/Monat/Atom S1260/8G Speicher/500GB Festplatte/unbegrenzter Datenverkehr/Deutschland

>>:  Standard-Internet, 512 MB Speicher, 2 Mbit/s, Hong Kong Hyper-V VPS-Test

Artikel empfehlen

Uptime Robot und StatusCake: Kostenlose Website-Überwachung

Uptime Robot ist eine externe Website, die kosten...

Shock Hosting 1 GB RAM Los Angeles KVM VPS-Bewertung

Details: Shock Hosting: 3,74 $/Monat/1 GB RAM/20 ...

Centos 6/7-System, Home-Partition anpassen und Root-Partition erweitern

Manchmal wird bei der Installation des CentOS-Sys...

PieLayer: VPS ab 10 $, mit Standorten in Deutschland, Frankreich usw.

PieLayer, alt und stabil. Die neusten Angebote la...