Yiyun 512 MB RAM Los Angeles KVM VPS-Testbericht

Yiyun 512 MB RAM Los Angeles KVM VPS-Testbericht

Das gestrige Angebot lautete CPU: 2*2,26 GHz/512 M ECC/20 GB/30 Mbit/s/4 IPs, mit einer jährlichen Zahlung von 169 Yuan, was nicht schlecht war. Hier ist die Rezension:

1. Systeminformationen, Bandbreite, I/O-Test

 CPU model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz Number of cores : 2 CPU frequency : 2600.076 MHz Total size of Disk : 28.4 GB (1.1 GB Used) Total amount of Mem : 495 MB (47 MB Used) Total amount of Swap : 459 MB (0 MB Used) System uptime : 0 days, 0 hour 13 min Load average : 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 OS : Debian GNU/Linux 7 Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 3.2.0-4-amd64 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O speed(1st run) : 189 MB/s I/O speed(2nd run) : 206 MB/s I/O speed(3rd run) : 167 MB/s Average I/O speed : 187.3 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name IPv4 address Download Speed CacheFly 205.234.175.175 81.6MB/s Linode, Tokyo, JP 106.187.96.148 2.41MB/s Linode, Singapore, SG 139.162.23.4 1.36MB/s Linode, London, UK 176.58.107.39 1.84MB/s Linode, Frankfurt, DE 139.162.130.8 1.66MB/s Linode, Fremont, CA 50.116.14.9 35.8MB/s Softlayer, Dallas, TX 173.192.68.18 6.40MB/s Softlayer, Seattle, WA 67.228.112.250 12.3MB/s Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE 159.122.69.4 1.67MB/s Softlayer, Singapore, SG 119.81.28.170 1.39MB/s Softlayer, HongKong, CN 119.81.130.170 1.54MB/s

2. Upload-/Download-Bandbreitentest

 Retrieving speedtest.net server list... Selecting best server based on ping... Hosted by CenturyLink, Inc (Cheyenne, WY) [9.89 km]: 40.472 ms Testing download speed................................................................................ Download: 320.69 Mbit/s Testing upload speed................................................................................................ Upload: 29.55 Mbit/s

3. Inländische Zugangsgeschwindigkeit

4. Festplatten-E/A-Leistungstest

 dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 5.29696 s, 50.7 MB/s

5. UnixBench

 Benchmark Run: Mon Jul 03 2017 20:13:38 - 20:41:45 2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 32470238.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 3508.2 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 1389.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 268613.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 71002.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 864419.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 422642.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 66433.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 2950.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3363.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 628.9 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 498006.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 32470238.2 2782.4 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3508.2 637.8 Execl Throughput 43.0 1389.5 323.1 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 268613.9 678.3 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 71002.4 429.0 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 864419.4 1490.4 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 422642.7 339.7 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 66433.2 166.1 Process Creation 126.0 2950.8 234.2 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3363.8 793.4 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 628.9 1048.2 System Call Overhead 15000.0 498006.4 332.0 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 557.8 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Mon Jul 03 2017 20:41:45 - 21:09:54 2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 64703714.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 6999.0 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 2772.4 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 454648.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 108924.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1487979.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 851961.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 133731.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 4984.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4850.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 651.7 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 937214.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 64703714.6 5544.4 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 6999.0 1272.5 Execl Throughput 43.0 2772.4 644.7 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 454648.5 1148.1 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 108924.5 658.2 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1487979.9 2565.5 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 851961.9 684.9 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 133731.7 334.3 Process Creation 126.0 4984.7 395.6 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4850.2 1143.9 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 651.7 1086.2 System Call Overhead 15000.0 937214.1 624.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 961.0

6. Paketverlusttest

 Ping from 192.168.1.29 to 104.171.xxx.xxx ============================================================================== 07/03 20:17:41.158 Ping to 104.171.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL: 07/03 20:17:41.378 PingMin #1 Reply 32 bytes from 104.171.xxx.xxx: time=217ms TTL=51, ave=217.00ms 07/03 20:17:43.371 PingMax #3 Reply 32 bytes from 104.171.xxx.xxx: time=219ms TTL=51, ave=217.67ms 07/03 20:17:45.820 超時#5 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 07/03 20:17:51.367 PingMin #11 Reply 32 bytes from 104.171.xxx.xxx: time=215ms TTL=51, ave=217.70ms 07/03 20:17:52.367 PingMin #12 Reply 32 bytes from 104.171.xxx.xxx: time=214ms TTL=51, ave=217.36ms 07/03 20:17:53.373 PingMax #13 Reply 32 bytes from 104.171.xxx.xxx: time=221ms TTL=51, ave=217.67ms 07/03 20:17:58.819 超時#18 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 07/03 20:18:00.373 === 20 有效發送, 18 接收, 10.00% 丟失, 217.56ms 平均值=== --- 結果& 統計信息------------------------------------------------------開始時間: 2017/07/03 20:17:41經過時間: 000:00:19結束時間: 2017/07/03 20:18:00 ---------------- 20 總計發送0 無效接收(除了超時的其它錯誤) ---------------- 20 有效發送18 有效接收2 timed out (10.00% 丟失) Ping 最小值214ms, 最大值221ms, 平均值217.56ms

7. Routenverfolgung <br />Telekommunikation

China Unicom

<<:  So beheben Sie den Fehler „-bash: python: Befehl nicht gefunden“ auf Linux / Unix VPS

>>:  KrakenServers: 45 $/Monat/x5650/48 GB Speicher/1 TB Festplatte/10 TB Datenverkehr/Dallas

Artikel empfehlen

LAMP: Ein gutes VPS-Panel

LAMP bezieht sich auf die Betriebssystemumgebung ...

DeepNet Solutions 512 MB RAM KVM VPS Los Angeles Bewertung

Details: DeepNet Solutions: 0,9 $/Jahr/64 MB Spei...

Kimsufi Französischer dedizierter Server KS4C Bewertung

Konfiguration und Preis: i5-2400/16 GB Speicher/2...

HiFormance: 25 % Rabatt auf alle VPS, einschließlich Sonderpakete

HiFormance, ein amerikanisches Hosting-Unternehme...