Details : Heymman: 24 $/Monat/E3-1240 v3/16 GB Speicher/1 TB Festplatte/30 TB Datenverkehr/5 IP/Chicago. Vom Test her ziemlich gut und den Kauf wert! ! ! 1. Systeminformationen, Bandbreite, I/O-Test CPU model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1240 v3 @ 3.40GHz Number of cores : 8 CPU frequency : 3261.742 MHz Total size of Disk : 431.3 GB (1.4 GB Used) Total amount of Mem : 15823 MB (222 MB Used) Total amount of Swap : 16007 MB (0 MB Used) System uptime : 0 days, 1 hour 11 min Load average : 0.00, 0.01, 0.10 OS : CentOS 7.3.1611 Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 3.10.0-514.el7.x86_64 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O speed(1st run) : 437 MB/s I/O speed(2nd run) : 429 MB/s I/O speed(3rd run) : 438 MB/s Average I/O speed : 434.7 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name IPv4 address Download Speed CacheFly 205.234.175.175 104MB/s Linode, Tokyo, JP 106.187.96.148 15.5MB/s Linode, Singapore, SG 139.162.23.4 5.10MB/s Linode, London, UK 176.58.107.39 15.2MB/s Linode, Frankfurt, DE 139.162.130.8 7.92MB/s Linode, Fremont, CA 50.116.14.9 12.9MB/s Softlayer, Dallas, TX 173.192.68.18 57.2MB/s Softlayer, Seattle, WA 67.228.112.250 30.8MB/s Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE 159.122.69.4 13.6MB/s Softlayer, Singapore, SG 119.81.28.170 2.47MB/s Softlayer, HongKong, CN 119.81.130.170 4.97MB/s 2. Upload-/Download-Bandbreitentest Selecting best server based on ping... Hosted by NFOrce Entertainment BV (Amsterdam) [1.75 km]: 152.498 ms Testing download speed........................................... Download: 80.58 Mbit/s Testing upload speed............................................. Upload: 66.92 Mbit/s 3. Inländische Zugangsgeschwindigkeit
4. Festplatten-E/A-Leistungstest dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 44.8327 s, 6.0 MB/s oder hdparm -t /dev/sda1 /dev/sda1: Timing buffered disk reads: 1504 MB in 3.00 seconds = 501.24 MB/sec 5. UnixBench-Leistungstest Benchmark Run: Sat Mar 18 2017 22:23:38 - 22:53:31 8 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 44907594.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 2663.3 MWIPS (20.8 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 4534.4 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1484187.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 389392.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 3897754.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 2141430.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 293600.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 19841.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 10529.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2405.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 3672775.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 44907594.5 3848.1 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2663.3 484.2 Execl Throughput 43.0 4534.4 1054.5 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1484187.5 3747.9 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 389392.0 2352.8 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 3897754.2 6720.3 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2141430.4 1721.4 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 293600.2 734.0 Process Creation 126.0 19841.5 1574.7 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 10529.6 2483.4 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2405.3 4008.9 System Call Overhead 15000.0 3672775.3 2448.5 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 2054.3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Sat Mar 18 2017 22:53:31 - 23:21:39 8 CPUs in system; running 8 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 193988567.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 36153.7 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 32814.4 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1717340.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 442462.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5322198.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 8993038.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 2117612.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 102304.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 17997.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 5712.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 10021445.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 193988567.4 16622.8 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 36153.7 6573.4 Execl Throughput 43.0 32814.4 7631.3 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1717340.0 4336.7 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 442462.2 2673.5 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 5322198.6 9176.2 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 8993038.8 7229.1 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 2117612.8 5294.0 Process Creation 126.0 102304.5 8119.4 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 17997.9 4244.8 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 5712.0 9520.1 System Call Overhead 15000.0 10021445.2 6681.0 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 6647.3 6. Paketverlusttest: Ruisu, BBR usw. sind nicht installiert Ping from 192.168.1.243 to 185.191.xxx.xxx ============================================================================== 03/19 10:32:38.944 Ping to 185.191.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL: 03/19 10:32:39.309 PingMin #1 Reply 32 bytes from 185.191.xxx.xxx: time=361ms TTL=45, ave=361.00ms 03/19 10:32:40.675 超時#2 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 03/19 10:32:41.302 PingMax #3 Reply 32 bytes from 185.191.xxx.xxx: time=362ms TTL=45, ave=361.50ms 03/19 10:32:42.679 超時#4 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 03/19 10:32:44.685 超時#6 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 03/19 10:32:45.306 PingMax #7 Reply 32 bytes from 185.191.xxx.xxx: time=365ms TTL=45, ave=362.50ms 03/19 10:32:46.677 超時#8 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 03/19 10:32:47.314 PingMax #9 Reply 32 bytes from 185.191.xxx.xxx: time=371ms TTL=45, ave=364.20ms 03/19 10:32:48.670 超時#10 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 03/19 10:32:49.673 超時#11 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 03/19 10:32:50.677 超時#12 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 03/19 10:32:51.332 PingMax #13 Reply 32 bytes from 185.191.xxx.xxx: time=390ms TTL=45, ave=368.50ms 03/19 10:32:52.367 PingMax #14 Reply 32 bytes from 185.191.xxx.xxx: time=423ms TTL=45, ave=376.29ms 03/19 10:32:58.315 === 20 有效發送, 13 接收, 35.00% 丟失, 373.15ms 平均值=== --- 結果& 統計信息------------------------------------------------------開始時間: 2017/03/19 10:32:38經過時間: 000:00:19結束時間: 2017/03/19 10:32:58 ---------------- 20 總計發送0 無效接收(除了超時的其它錯誤) ---------------- 20 有效發送13 有效接收7 timed out (35.00% 丟失) Ping 最小值361ms, 最大值423ms, 平均值373.15ms 7. Traceroute
|