OptimizedVPS 1 GB RAM SSD-Festplatte Los Angeles KVM VPS-Test

Details: OptimizedVPS: 15 $/Jahr/512 MB RAM/5 GB SSD-Speicherplatz/1 TB Datenverkehr/KVM/Los Angeles/Unbegrenzte IP-Änderungen
Die Leistung der Maschine ist gut, das Netzwerk ist Los Angeles QN, eine reguläre Leitung, und die jährliche Zahlung von 15 US-Dollar zum Ändern der IP ist praktischer.
Willkommen zur TeleGram-Gruppendiskussion : https://t.me/zhujiwiki

1. Systeminformationen, Bandbreite, I/O-Test

 CPU Model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1240 v6 @ 3.70GHz CPU Cores : 2 Cores @ 3696.008 MHz x86_64 CPU Cache : 16384 KB OS : CentOS 6.9 (64 Bit) KVM Kernel : 2.6.32-696.30.1.el6.x86_64 Total Space : 8.9 GB (0.9 GB Used) Total RAM : 995 MB (191 MB Used 7 MB Buff) Total SWAP : 1023 MB (0 MB Used) Uptime : 0 days 3 hour 7 min Load average : 0.07, 0.02, 0.00 ASN & ISP : AS8100, QuadraNet Organization : QuadraNet Location : Los Angeles, United States / US Region : California ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 505 MB/s I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 504 MB/s I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 517 MB/s Average I/O Speed : 508.7 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Speedtest.net 683.33 Mbit/s 193.63 Mbit/s 1.94 ms Shanghai CT 2.44 Mbit/s 7.82 Mbit/s 260.677 ms Kunming CT 11.78 Mbit/s 25.83 Mbit/s 167.979 ms Chengdu CT 57.95 Mbit/s 25.13 Mbit/s 000.000 ms Shanghai CU 7.81 Mbit/s 27.91 Mbit/s 193.617 ms Xi'an CU 6.52 Mbit/s 16.19 Mbit/s 348.795 ms Chongqing CU 9.41 Mbit/s 16.12 Mbit/s 206.568 ms Xi'an CM 6.60 Mbit/s 39.77 Mbit/s 216.221 ms Chengdu CM 7.87 Mbit/s 26.65 Mbit/s 221.05 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Finished in : 3 min 36 sec Timestamp : 2018-07-03 14:56:13 GMT+8

2. Upload-/Download-Bandbreitentest

 Retrieving speedtest.net server list... Selecting best server based on ping... Hosted by Interoute VDC (Los Angeles, CA) [1.30 km]: 3.307 ms Testing download speed............................. Download: 782.81 Mbit/s Testing upload speed...............................

3. Inländische Zugangsgeschwindigkeit

4. Festplatten-E/A-Leistungstest

 dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 18.8393 s, 14.2 MB/s

5. UnixBench

 Benchmark Run: Tue Jul 03 2018 04:01:00 - 04:29:01 2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 45932842.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 4658.1 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 6202.7 lps (29.8 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1481874.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 388733.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 3470195.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 2649954.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 519413.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 19489.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 9935.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2220.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 3503324.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 45932842.9 3936.0 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4658.1 846.9 Execl Throughput 43.0 6202.7 1442.5 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1481874.8 3742.1 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 388733.7 2348.8 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 3470195.2 5983.1 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2649954.7 2130.2 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 519413.1 1298.5 Process Creation 126.0 19489.9 1546.8 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 9935.5 2343.3 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2220.6 3701.0 System Call Overhead 15000.0 3503324.1 2335.5 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 2300.0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Tue Jul 03 2018 04:29:01 - 04:57:04 2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 92071872.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 9345.0 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 14396.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1656793.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 421663.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5048110.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 5355394.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 1045666.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 40821.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 16249.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2373.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 5727350.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 92071872.6 7889.6 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 9345.0 1699.1 Execl Throughput 43.0 14396.4 3348.0 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1656793.9 4183.8 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 421663.9 2547.8 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 5048110.1 8703.6 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 5355394.7 4305.0 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 1045666.8 2614.2 Process Creation 126.0 40821.3 3239.8 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 16249.1 3832.3 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2373.4 3955.7 System Call Overhead 15000.0 5727350.9 3818.2 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 3790.1

6. Paketverlusttest

 Ping from 192.168.0.29 to 155.94.xxx.xxx ============================================================================== 07/03 14:58:20.674 Ping to 155.94.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL: 07/03 14:58:20.907 PingMin #1 Reply 32 bytes from 155.94.xxx.xxx: time=229ms TTL=51, ave=229.00ms 07/03 14:58:21.874 PingMin #2 Reply 32 bytes from 155.94.xxx.xxx: time=197ms TTL=51, ave=213.00ms 07/03 14:58:22.865 PingMin #3 Reply 32 bytes from 155.94.xxx.xxx: time=196ms TTL=51, ave=207.33ms 07/03 14:58:24.854 PingMin #5 Reply 32 bytes from 155.94.xxx.xxx: time=187ms TTL=51, ave=201.40ms 07/03 14:58:27.905 PingMax #8 Reply 32 bytes from 155.94.xxx.xxx: time=234ms TTL=51, ave=204.88ms 07/03 14:58:37.911 PingMax #18 Reply 32 bytes from 155.94.xxx.xxx: time=240ms TTL=51, ave=203.61ms 07/03 14:58:52.854 PingMin #33 Reply 32 bytes from 155.94.xxx.xxx: time=186ms TTL=51, ave=201.00ms 07/03 14:58:55.461 超時#35 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 07/03 14:59:03.852 PingMin #44 Reply 32 bytes from 155.94.xxx.xxx: time=185ms TTL=51, ave=199.05ms 07/03 14:59:19.851 PingMin #60 Reply 32 bytes from 155.94.xxx.xxx: time=184ms TTL=51, ave=198.42ms 07/03 14:59:44.462 超時#84 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 07/03 14:59:59.461 超時#99 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 07/03 14:59:59.871 === 100 有效發送, 97 接收, 3.00% 丟失, 198.16ms 平均值=== --- 結果& 統計信息------------------------------------------------------開始時間: 2018/07/03 14:58:20經過時間: 000:01:39結束時間: 2018/07/03 14:59:59 ---------------- 100 總計發送0 無效接收(除了超時的其它錯誤) ---------------- 100 有效發送97 有效接收3 timed out (3.00% 丟失) Ping 最小值184ms, 最大值240ms, 平均值198.16ms

7. Routenverfolgung <br /> Telekommunikation

China Unicom

8. YouTube-Geschwindigkeitstest