8 Cloud Technology 1 GB RAM KVM VPS Hongkong CN2 Einfache Bewertung

Details: 8 Cloud-Technologie: 70 Yuan/Monat/1 GB Speicher/55 GB SSD-Speicherplatz/unbegrenzter Datenverkehr/KVM/Hongkong/US CN2

Systeminformationen und Bandbreitentest :

 System Info ----------- Processor : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5670 @ 2.93GHz CPU Cores : 2 Frequency : 1596.059 MHz Memory : 988 MB Swap : 991 MB Uptime : 12:10, OS : CentOS release 6.4 (Final) Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 2.6.32-358.6.1.el6.x86_64 Hostname : MyCloudServer Speedtest (IPv4 only) --------------------- Your public IPv4 is 198.44.xxx.xxx Location Provider Speed CDN Cachefly 3.15MB/s Atlanta, GA, US Coloat 804KB/s Dallas, TX, US Softlayer 306KB/s Seattle, WA, US Softlayer 1.24MB/s San Jose, CA, US Softlayer 1.25MB/s Washington, DC, US Softlayer 1.15MB/s Tokyo, Japan Linode 2.04MB/s Singapore Softlayer 2.01MB/s Rotterdam, Netherlands id3.net 679KB/s Haarlem, Netherlands Leaseweb 1.25MB/s Disk Speed ---------- I/O (1st run) : 300 MB/s I/O (2nd run) : 285 MB/s I/O (3rd run) : 314 MB/s Average I/O : 299.667 MB/s

E/A-Leistung der Festplatte :

 dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 3.5844 s, 74.9 MB/s

UnixBench-Ergebnis :

 Benchmark Run: Wed Nov 16 2016 14:55:18 - 15:23:25 2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 25919116.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 3577.3 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 1227.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 214778.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 58624.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 649591.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 360961.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 60287.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 2570.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 2756.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 515.7 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 460033.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 25919116.4 2221.0 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3577.3 650.4 Execl Throughput 43.0 1227.1 285.4 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 214778.5 542.4 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 58624.4 354.2 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 649591.4 1120.0 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 360961.2 290.2 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 60287.9 150.7 Process Creation 126.0 2570.7 204.0 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2756.5 650.1 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 515.7 859.4 System Call Overhead 15000.0 460033.2 306.7 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 476.1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Wed Nov 16 2016 15:23:25 - 15:51:32 2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 50268219.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 7120.4 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 2435.8 lps (29.6 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 341888.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 92745.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1101805.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 712243.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 115566.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 4634.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3905.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 524.9 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 853874.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 50268219.1 4307.5 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 7120.4 1294.6 Execl Throughput 43.0 2435.8 566.5 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 341888.8 863.4 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 92745.5 560.4 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1101805.0 1899.7 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 712243.4 572.5 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 115566.3 288.9 Process Creation 126.0 4634.1 367.8 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3905.2 921.0 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 524.9 874.8 System Call Overhead 15000.0 853874.4 569.2 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 811.0

Inländischer Ping :

Paketverlusttest : Ruisu ist nicht installiert

 Ping from 192.168.1.102 to 198.44.xxx.xxx ============================================================================== 11/16 16:00:44.028 Ping to 198.44.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL: 11/16 16:00:44.128 PingMin #1 Reply 32 bytes from 198.44.xxx.xxx: time=96ms TTL=50, ave=96.00ms 11/16 16:00:45.127 PingMax #2 Reply 32 bytes from 198.44.xxx.xxx: time=98ms TTL=50, ave=97.00ms 11/16 16:00:47.128 PingMax #4 Reply 32 bytes from 198.44.xxx.xxx: time=100ms TTL=50, ave=97.75ms 11/16 16:00:49.780 超時#6 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 11/16 16:00:50.782 超時#7 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 11/16 16:00:51.782 超時#8 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 11/16 16:00:55.130 PingMax #12 Reply 32 bytes from 198.44.xxx.xxx: time=102ms TTL=50, ave=98.00ms 11/16 16:00:56.785 超時#13 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 11/16 16:00:58.116 PingMin #15 Reply 32 bytes from 198.44.xxx.xxx: time=93ms TTL=50, ave=97.64ms 11/16 16:01:00.786 超時#17 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 11/16 16:01:01.133 PingMax #18 Reply 32 bytes from 198.44.xxx.xxx: time=104ms TTL=50, ave=98.00ms 11/16 16:01:03.769 超時#20 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 11/16 16:01:03.771 === 20 有效發送, 14 接收, 30.00% 丟失, 98.07ms 平均值=== --- 結果& 統計信息------------------------------------------------------開始時間: 2016/11/16 16:00:44經過時間: 000:00:19結束時間: 2016/11/16 16:01:03 ---------------- 20 總計發送0 無效接收(除了超時的其它錯誤) ---------------- 20 有效發送14 有效接收6 timed out (30.00% 丟失) Ping 最小值93ms, 最大值104ms, 平均值98.07ms